EDC 101 result the
The Flip Pack Backpack and the Art of Turning Things Around
The Flip Pack Backpack and the Art of Turning Things Around
I did not switch to a flip pack backpack because I needed more space. I switched because I got tired of taking my bag off every time I wanted one small thing.
That sounds minor. It is minor. But most changes in a daily carry setup come from small irritations that repeat often enough to matter. Standing in line for coffee. Sitting on a bench outside the train station. Pausing on a sidewalk to check a note. The old routine was always the same. Slip one strap off, swing the bag down, catch it before it slides too far, unzip, dig around, zip it back up, wrestle it onto both shoulders again. It never felt dramatic. Just clumsy.
A flip pack backpack shifts that whole rhythm. You keep one strap on. You rotate the bag across your chest. Suddenly the zipper faces you. It is not a performance. It is not tactical theater. It is just a different geometry. Access without full removal.
The first few days felt strange. I was aware of the motion, like I was trying out a new handshake. I worried it might look like I was about to do something more serious than check my phone. That is part of the quiet tension in EDC. You want access, but you do not want to look like you are gearing up for anything. A bag that flips forward can look decisive. Most of the time I am just grabbing lip balm or a pen.
What I realized is that the flip pack backpack changes your relationship to what you carry. When the bag stays on your body, even as it swings around, it feels less like luggage and more like an extension. You do not set it down. You do not create distance from it. There is no moment where your stuff sits behind you, slightly exposed, slightly forgotten. Everything stays in your orbit.
That might sound dramatic for a backpack, but carry long enough and you notice how often your bag ends up on the floor next to a chair or leaning against a table leg. A flip pack design reduces those moments. You are either wearing it on your back or holding it in front of you. There is less limbo.
Of course there are trade offs. There always are.
A traditional two strap backpack distributes weight in a way that feels balanced and almost invisible once you forget about it. A flip pack backpack often relies on a single main strap or a setup that favors rotation over symmetry. If you load it like you would a full size backpack, you will feel it. One shoulder takes more responsibility. Your posture shifts slightly. By the end of the day you know which side carried the burden.
That forced me to reconsider what I actually needed to bring. A notebook, yes. A small pouch with cables, fine. Water bottle if I know I will be out for hours. But the extra layer I always pack just in case? Maybe not. The second notebook that lives in the bottom pocket because I hate running out of paper? Probably unnecessary.
A flip pack backpack rewards restraint. It punishes excess in subtle ways. The more disciplined your carry, the better it feels. In that sense it fits the EDC mindset more honestly than a cavernous bag that invites you to fill it just because you can.
There is also something about the motion itself that becomes addictive. Swing, unzip, retrieve, zip, swing back. It is fluid once you stop thinking about it. You begin to organize the interior around that movement. The items you reach for most often migrate toward the front facing compartment. The rarely used gear sinks deeper. You build your own hierarchy of access without consciously planning it.
I noticed I stopped rummaging. With a regular backpack, I would sometimes stand there digging through layers, half aware that I had packed too much. With the flip pack, everything feels more deliberate. If I cannot reach it easily when the bag is rotated forward, maybe it does not belong in this setup.
There is a personality type that gravitates toward this kind of bag. Not the person who wants to carry a portable office. Not the person who treats their backpack like a survival kit for every possible inconvenience. It suits someone who moves a lot during the day, who sits briefly and then stands again, who values quick transitions. It feels urban without trying too hard. Functional without shouting about it.
At the same time, it can look slightly unconventional. Some people prefer the anonymity of a standard backpack. The flip motion draws a bit of attention, especially at first. I had to get comfortable with that. The truth is most people do not care. They are busy with their own bags and their own small frustrations.
What surprised me most was how the flip pack backpack changed my awareness of space. In crowded areas, being able to rotate the bag to the front creates a sense of control. You are not taking it off and holding it awkwardly. You are not bumping into people behind you. The bag becomes something you can see. That visibility makes you more conscious of what you are carrying and how it occupies space.
EDC is often described in terms of gear, but it is really about friction. Where does your day snag? Where do you lose a few seconds, a bit of patience, a touch of focus? For me, the friction was in access. I did not need more pockets. I needed fewer steps between intention and action.
Is a flip pack backpack perfect? No. On days when I carry heavier loads, I miss the balanced comfort of two solid straps. On long walks, I sometimes switch shoulders to even things out. There are moments when I think about going back to a traditional design.
But then I find myself standing somewhere ordinary, needing something small, and I flip the bag forward in one smooth motion. No setting down. No juggling. No minor inconvenience stretching into a ritual.
That is usually enough to keep it in rotation.
A bag does not have to be revolutionary to earn a place in your daily life. It just has to remove one layer of friction you did not realize was wearing on you. The flip pack backpack does that for me. It turns a repetitive annoyance into a simple gesture.
And in a carry culture that often obsesses over what we add, sometimes the most meaningful shift comes from how we move.
The Quiet Case for a Titanium Magnetic Disconnect on Your Keychain
The Quiet Case for a Titanium Magnetic Disconnect on Your Keychain
I used to think a keyring was a solved problem.
You put your keys on a ring. You add what you need. You forget about it. End of story.
Then one afternoon I was standing in a parking garage, juggling a coffee in one hand and a gym tag in the other, trying to separate my car key from the rest of the mess without dropping everything. The ring fought back the way split rings always do. Fingernails bent. Patience thinned. The whole ritual felt older than it should have.
That was the first time I started paying attention to the idea of a magnetic disconnect. Not because it looked cool. Not because titanium has that muted gray appeal that makes people feel like they made a serious decision. Just because I was tired of negotiating with a tiny circle of steel every time I needed one key and not the rest.
Everyday carry has a way of exposing small inefficiencies. Not dramatic problems. Just friction. The kind that repeats itself quietly until you notice you are compensating for it without thinking. A keyring is one of those things. It lives in your pocket, heavy or light depending on your discipline, and it dictates a surprising amount of your daily choreography.
A magnetic disconnect changes that choreography in a subtle way. You stop prying keys apart and start separating them. The motion becomes deliberate. Pull. Hand off. Snap back together. It feels closer to intention than struggle.
Titanium enters the picture almost by accident. You tell yourself it is about weight. You tell yourself it will not rust, that it will age in a way that matches the rest of your pocket. Those things are true, but they are not the whole story. Titanium carries a certain restraint. It does not shine unless you ask it to. It does not beg for attention. It just exists in that quiet gray space between flashy and fragile.
And if you are honest, that matters.
EDC is rarely about need in the strict sense. It is about the relationship between you and the objects that orbit you every day. A titanium magnetic disconnect says something about how much you value modularity. It says you anticipate small transitions. Office to gym. Home to car. Loaning your vehicle to someone without giving them your entire life in one clump of metal.
There is also the question of trust. Magnets feel suspect at first. We have all had something magnetic fail us at some point. You attach it to your keys and for a few days you are hyper aware of it. You tug at it. You test it. You wait for it to betray you in a grocery store parking lot.
It usually does not.
What happens instead is that it fades into the background. You forget it is there until you need it. That is when you realize it has quietly redrawn the boundaries of your keychain. Your house key no longer has to attend every errand. Your mailbox key can live in exile until called upon. The disconnect becomes a gatekeeper, deciding which parts of your life travel together and which parts stay home.
There is something slightly obsessive about optimizing a keychain. Most people never think about it. They accept the jangling mass as a fact of adulthood. But if you are reading this, you probably do think about it. You have probably removed a loyalty tag because it offended your sense of order. You have probably weighed the usefulness of a tiny tool against the annoyance of extra bulk.
A magnetic disconnect fits into that mindset because it is not about adding capability. It is about controlling sprawl. It creates boundaries without forcing you to commit to a permanent configuration. That flexibility is the real appeal.
Still, it is not a pure upgrade. Nothing in EDC ever is.
Magnets add a point of failure. Another seam. Another decision. You might find yourself checking it absentmindedly, the way some people pat their pocket for their wallet. You might question whether you solved a problem or just introduced a new variable into a system that was fine.
I went through that phase. For a week I missed the dumb simplicity of a solid ring. No parts. No separation. Just one stubborn loop holding everything together. There is something honest about that kind of permanence.
But permanence can also be laziness.
A titanium magnetic disconnect forces you to think about what actually needs to be on you at all times. It makes you curate. Once you can detach pieces easily, you start asking why they were attached in the first place. The key to a storage unit you visit twice a year suddenly feels excessive. The oversized fob that came with your car starts to look negotiable.
In that sense, the disconnect becomes less about convenience and more about editing. It encourages a lighter pocket. And a lighter pocket changes how you move through the day. Less noise. Less bulk pressing against your leg when you sit down. Fewer metallic announcements every time you set your keys on a table.
There is also a small, irrational satisfaction in the way magnets come together. The soft pull. The precise alignment. It feels engineered without being flashy. That sensation is hard to explain to someone who does not care about this stuff. It sounds ridiculous when you say it out loud.
It is ridiculous. And that is fine.
EDC culture sometimes drifts toward extremes. Exotic materials. Overbuilt hardware. The idea that every object needs to survive the end of the world. A titanium magnetic disconnect for a keychain rings quieter than that. It is not about survival. It is about preference. About deciding that the way your keys come apart matters enough to change.
Will it change your life. No.
Will it slightly refine one of the most repetitive motions in your day. Probably.
And that might be enough.
In the end, a keychain is one of the most honest reflections of how you think. Chaotic or curated. Heavy or minimal. Fixed or modular. A titanium magnetic disconnect sits squarely in the modular camp. It admits that your day is not one continuous block but a series of small chapters. It gives you a way to separate them cleanly.
You could live without it. Most people do.
But if you have ever stood there fighting a split ring with bent fingernails and a growing sense that there has to be a better way, you already understand the appeal.
The Weight of a Small Copper Pen
The Weight of a Small Copper Pen
I did not start carrying a copper pen because I needed a better writing experience. I started carrying it because I was tired of plastic.
That sounds dramatic, but it was not some manifesto. It was a quiet annoyance. Every time I borrowed a pen from a counter, it felt disposable before I even touched paper. Lightweight, forgettable, designed to vanish. I realized I treated my own pens the same way. Use it, lose it, replace it without thought. There is something strange about relying on an object daily and not respecting it at all.
The copper pen changed that, mostly because it refuses to disappear.
It is not flashy. In fact, when it is new, it almost looks too bright. But give it a week in a pocket and it starts to settle. The shine fades. The surface dulls. It picks up faint marks from keys, from coins, from whatever else shares that space. It begins to look like it belongs to you, even if you never meant to get sentimental about it.
In a minimalist everyday carry setup, every item has to earn its space. I am not interested in carrying a bag just to carry more things. My pockets are the limit. Phone. Wallet. Keys. The pen competes with all of them. That alone forces the question: why?
The honest answer is that I do not always need it. Most days I could get by without writing anything longer than a signature on a receipt. My phone handles lists, reminders, random thoughts. It does it faster than any pen ever could. So carrying a pen is not about efficiency. It is about friction.
Writing by hand slows me down. That is the point.
There is something grounding about pulling a small piece of metal from your pocket, unscrewing it, and pressing it to paper. You feel the weight immediately. Copper is not heavy in an absolute sense, but compared to a plastic pen it feels deliberate. The weight forces you to acknowledge it. It is not just an extension of your hand. It is an object with presence.
I notice this most in small, forgettable moments. Sitting in my car before heading into a store, scribbling a quick list on the back of an envelope. At a coffee shop, sketching out a rough idea in a cheap notebook instead of tapping it into a screen. Even signing for a package feels different. The pen feels like mine. Not borrowed, not disposable, not temporary.
That ownership changes how I move through the day in subtle ways.
Minimalist carry is often misunderstood as owning less for the sake of aesthetics. Clean pockets, clean lines, fewer choices. But in practice it is more about commitment. If you choose to carry something every day, you are saying it deserves that limited space. A copper pen, especially a small one, is a quiet statement that writing still matters to you.
I have tried removing it from my setup. A few times I convinced myself it was unnecessary weight. For a week or two I would leave it on the desk at home. Nothing catastrophic happened. Life continued. But I found myself reaching for it out of habit. Patting my pocket and noticing the absence. It is strange how quickly an object can become part of your rhythm.
The patina is another part of the appeal, though I hesitate to romanticize it. Copper ages whether you care or not. It darkens. It reacts to your skin. Over time it starts to look less like something you bought and more like something you have kept. In a world where most objects are designed to look the same forever, that slow change feels honest.
It also exposes your inconsistency. Some weeks the pen looks polished because you handled it constantly. Other weeks it sits untouched and the finish deepens, uneven and blotchy. It becomes a record of your habits. You can almost see when you were engaged with your own thoughts and when you let everything default to a screen.
There is also a practical side that rarely gets mentioned in the minimalist conversation. A small copper pen is hard to ignore in your pocket. It reminds you it is there. That can be inconvenient if you prefer absolute comfort, but I have come to appreciate that slight awareness. It keeps me conscious of what I am carrying. If something feels unnecessary, I remove it. The pen has survived those audits more than once.
It is not the smoothest writing instrument I have used. It is not the lightest. It is not the most comfortable for long sessions. That is not why it stays. It stays because it feels like a decision rather than an afterthought.
There is a certain mindset behind everyday carry that rarely gets said out loud. We are trying to feel prepared, yes, but also anchored. In control of small variables. A pen is one of the simplest tools you can carry, yet it represents the ability to think externally. To take a thought out of your head and make it physical. That matters more than we admit.
When I look at my current setup laid out on a table, it is almost boring. Dark wallet. Plain phone. Worn keys. The copper pen is the only piece that seems alive. It has color variation, texture, small imperfections. It looks used because it is used. That visual difference reminds me that everyday carry is not about collecting objects. It is about interacting with them.
I do not carry the pen to impress anyone. Most people never notice it. If they do, they usually just say it is heavier than they expected. That is fine. The value is private. It is in the moment I choose to write something down instead of trusting myself to remember. It is in the pause before ink hits paper.
There are days I question whether it is worth the pocket space. Minimalism is ruthless that way. Every item must justify itself repeatedly. But the pen continues to pass the test, not because it is essential in the survival sense, but because it nudges me toward intention.
A minimalist copper pen is a small contradiction. It is both simple and excessive. You could survive without it. You could argue it adds nothing that your phone cannot replicate. Yet it persists in the kit because it changes how you engage with the ordinary parts of your day.
That is enough.
At some point, everyday carry stops being about optimization and starts being about identity. Not in a loud way. In a quiet, pocket level way. The copper pen is a reminder that even in a streamlined setup, there is room for something analog, something that ages, something that leaves a mark.
And sometimes that mark is just a grocery list written in your own handwriting, which feels more permanent than it has any right to be.
The Quiet Case for a Waterproof Phone Pouch in an EDC Organizer
The Quiet Case for a Waterproof Phone Pouch in an EDC Organizer
I did not start carrying a waterproof phone pouch because I planned to swim across a river. I started because I got tired of checking my phone every time I heard rain hit pavement.
That is the part nobody admits. Most everyday carry decisions are not about worst case scenarios. They are about small irritations that stack up. A damp pocket. A coffee splash that lands a little too close. That awkward shuffle when you are caught in a sudden downpour and your first instinct is not to move yourself out of the rain, but to protect the rectangle in your hand.
For a long time I told myself it was unnecessary. My phone already claimed to be water resistant. I do not go hiking through swamps. I am not kayaking to work. Adding a waterproof phone pouch to an EDC organizer felt like overcorrection. Like wrapping a couch in plastic.
But everyday carry is rarely about what you plan to do. It is about how you move through ordinary space. Commutes. Errands. Sitting at a park bench that looked dry until you stood up. Tossing your organizer into a gym locker that smells faintly like last week’s humidity.
The turning point was not dramatic. It was a grocery run. I had my organizer in a tote bag with a leaking bottle of sparkling water. Not a flood. Just a slow, quiet seep. By the time I noticed, everything inside felt vaguely clammy. Nothing was ruined. That almost made it worse. It was just enough moisture to make me uneasy.
I realized I treat my phone differently than everything else I carry. My notebook can warp a little. My pen can dry out and be replaced. A flashlight can handle being knocked around. The phone is not just another object. It is my map, my wallet backup, my camera, my notes, my quiet distraction in line at the pharmacy. It is less a tool and more an extension.
And yet I was letting it float around in fabric pockets like spare change.
A waterproof pouch inside an EDC organizer is not glamorous. It is not even visible most of the time. That is part of the appeal. It lives inside something else, adding a layer of intention without announcing itself. You open the organizer and there is a clear barrier between your phone and the rest of your life.
The first week I carried one, I kept noticing how deliberate it felt to slide the phone in and seal it. There is a soft resistance when the closure meets itself. A small ritual. It slows you down for half a second. You are choosing protection over convenience.
And yes, it is less convenient. You cannot just reach in and tap the screen without thinking. Face recognition gets slightly confused through the material. Quick photos become two step operations. That friction matters.
EDC people talk a lot about friction. Usually the goal is to reduce it. Streamline the draw. Minimize bulk. Cut redundancy. But sometimes friction is the point. It forces awareness.
When my phone sits in a waterproof pouch inside my organizer, I use it less impulsively. I am less likely to pull it out while walking. Less likely to scroll while waiting for coffee. The extra layer makes me ask whether I really need it right now.
There is something quietly rebellious about that. Not in a dramatic way. Just a refusal to let the most demanding object in your life be the easiest one to access.
Of course, there is also the practical side. Weather has become less predictable where I live. A clear sky at noon means nothing by three. I got tired of shoving my phone under my shirt like a teenager hiding a note. With a waterproof pouch, I do not negotiate with the sky anymore. Rain becomes background noise.
It also changes how I pack my organizer. Liquids now sit without ceremony next to electronics. A small hand sanitizer bottle. A compact sunscreen. A metal water bottle that occasionally sweats through its own dignity. I do not have to build compartments based on fear. The phone has its own sealed world.
That separation has a psychological effect. My organizer feels more modular. Less fragile. I can toss it into a backpack with a damp gym towel and not feel that low grade anxiety about moisture creeping in.
Still, I resisted for months because it felt like overkill. I imagined myself explaining it to someone. No, I am not planning a river crossing. No, I do not work on a boat. It sounded paranoid.
EDC culture sometimes leans into preparedness theater. People carry items for scenarios that may never happen. I try to keep my setup honest. If I cannot picture using it in a normal week, it does not stay.
What surprised me is how normal the use became. Not dramatic. Not heroic. Just everyday insurance against clumsiness and weather and the general unpredictability of being a human who sets things down in the wrong place.
There is also something to be said for containment. A waterproof phone pouch contains more than water. It contains dust at the bottom of a work bag. It contains sand when you sit near the shore and tell yourself you will not get close enough to matter. It contains the fine debris of daily life that slowly works its way into charging ports and speaker grills.
We accept that our phones will degrade. Scratches are inevitable. Battery life fades. But there is a difference between wear that comes from use and wear that comes from neglect.
Carrying a waterproof pouch inside an organizer feels less like fear and more like respect. Not reverence. Just acknowledgment that this object carries more of my life than anything else in my pocket.
It is not a perfect solution. It adds thickness. If your organizer is already tight, you will feel it. There are days I consider pulling it out to slim things down. Minimalism has its own pull. The clean outline of fewer layers.
Sometimes I do remove it. Usually in dry seasons when rain feels theoretical. And almost every time, within a week, something small reminds me why it was there. A spilled drink at a shared table. A sudden storm. A child with sticky hands who wants to see a photo.
The pouch goes back in.
I have noticed that the people who question it most are the same ones who never back up their data. They trust the marketing promises of water resistance. They assume accidents are for other people.
Maybe that is the real divide in EDC. Not between minimalists and maximalists, but between those who assume control and those who assume randomness.
A waterproof phone pouch in an EDC organizer is a quiet admission that randomness exists. That you are capable of spilling your own coffee. That weather does not check your calendar. That your bag might tip over in the back seat.
It is not dramatic. It will not save the day in some cinematic moment. Most weeks, it does nothing at all.
And that is exactly why it earns its place.
Everyday carry is a conversation with yourself about what matters enough to take up space. Space in your pockets. Space in your bag. Space in your routine. A waterproof pouch takes up a little of all three.
For me, that small trade feels reasonable. Not because I expect disaster, but because I have accepted inconvenience as part of being alive. The pouch does not eliminate risk. It just narrows it quietly, without asking for attention.
When I zip up my organizer now, I do not think about rivers or storms. I think about the ordinary day ahead. Meetings. Sidewalks. Coffee cups balanced on uneven surfaces.
The phone is sealed inside its own clear envelope, separated from the mess of the world by a thin barrier. Not invincible. Just buffered.
That feels like enough.
The Case for a Knot on a Zipper
The Case for a Knot on a Zipper
Most people will spend real money upgrading what is inside the bag and ignore the part they touch the most.
The zipper pull is usually an afterthought. A tiny piece of metal or cord that comes preinstalled, thin enough to disappear between your fingers when you are in a hurry. I did not think about mine either until one winter morning when I tried to open my backpack with cold hands and felt that familiar slip. Fingertips grazing metal. No purchase. No leverage. Just that brief, irritating pause between intention and access.
I did not buy anything to fix it. I tied a knot.
It was a short piece of cord I had sitting in a drawer. Nothing tactical, nothing color coordinated. I threaded it through the zipper hole, tied a simple overhand knot, then tied another on top of it because the first one felt too small. I trimmed the ends and melted them slightly so they would not fray. That was it.
The change was subtle but immediate. The bag felt different to use. Not better in a flashy way. Just more cooperative. I could grab the zipper without looking. With gloves on. Half awake. The knot gave my fingers something to believe in.
That is the strange thing about a knot zipper pull. It is almost nothing. A few inches of cord and a decision. But it changes the relationship between you and the object. It turns a factory detail into something chosen.
In the world of everyday carry, people talk a lot about upgrades. New scales. Custom clips. Aftermarket everything. There is a certain satisfaction in replacing a stock part with something that signals taste or knowledge. A knot does not signal anything. It is quiet. Almost primitive. It says I needed this to work better and I handled it.
I have tried more complicated versions. Decorative knots with names I had to look up. Intricate weaves that looked impressive for about a week until I realized they were too bulky or too stiff. They caught on things. They made the bag look like it was trying too hard. I cut them off.
I keep coming back to the simplest knot possible. One that adds just enough bulk to grab and just enough texture to feel distinct. Nothing more.
There is also a psychological angle that is hard to ignore. Tying a knot onto your zipper is an act of low level customization. It is not about standing out. It is about quiet control. The bag might be mass produced. The pouch might be identical to thousands of others. But that knot is yours. You tied it. You decided the length. You decided how it hangs.
It is similar to how some people prefer worn leather over pristine finishes. There is comfort in evidence of handling. A knot zipper pull shows intention. It suggests that someone has used this bag enough to find a minor flaw and correct it.
I once removed all the zipper pulls from a small organizer because I wanted a cleaner look. For about a month I enjoyed the minimalism. The bag looked streamlined. Sleek. Then real life stepped in. Trying to open a compartment while holding a coffee in the other hand turned into a small balancing act. Fingernails scraping for the edge of metal. I put the knots back.
EDC culture sometimes drifts toward the dramatic. Gear laid out like a museum display. Flashlight beams measured against brick walls. Knives photographed in perfect light. Meanwhile, the zipper pull is just there, doing its quiet job. It does not photograph well. It does not impress anyone. But it is what you actually grab several times a day.
There is also restraint in choosing a knot instead of a branded accessory. It costs almost nothing. It does not require research. It does not ask you to compare materials or finishes. It solves a problem at the level the problem exists.
That restraint matters more than it sounds. Everyday carry is supposed to be about intention. Not accumulation. A knot zipper pull is intention distilled. You identified friction in your routine and removed it with the simplest tool available.
Sometimes I change the color. Not to match an outfit or make a statement, but to differentiate compartments. A muted cord on the main pocket. A brighter one on the small pouch where I keep the things I reach for less often. The color becomes a memory cue. My hand learns before my brain does.
Other times I cut them all off and start over. There is something oddly satisfying about resetting to zero. A bag without pulls feels unfinished. Almost sterile. Tying new knots feels like moving into a space and hanging your own hooks on the wall.
None of this is dramatic. No one will stop you to ask about your zipper pulls. If they do, they probably understand already.
A knot zipper pull lives in that space between necessity and preference. The zipper will function without it. You can survive the inconvenience. But you add the knot because you care about the small frictions. You care about how your tools meet your hands.
That might be the real dividing line in everyday carry. Not how much you carry, or how expensive it is, but whether you notice the tiny points of resistance in your day. Whether you accept them or adjust them.
I still have bags without modified pulls. I am not consistent. Some mornings I grab whatever is closest and head out the door. But the bags I use the most, the ones that feel broken in and reliable, all have those small loops of cord hanging from the zippers. Softened over time. Slightly darkened from use.
They are not upgrades in the traditional sense. They are reminders. Pay attention. Fix what annoys you. Keep it simple.
It is just a knot. That is the whole point.

